Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abortion. Show all posts
Friday, April 12, 2013
Friday Mentionables: Post-Birth Abortion, Openness, and Nephilim
Check'em out.
Video: Planned Parenthood Official Argues for Right to Post-Birth Abortion
Openness and the closing of the american mind
Could the Nephilim have been Neanderthals?
Ask RC: What does the Bible mean when it says that the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were attractive and they took them as wives, bringing for the Nephilim, the mighty men of old, in the lead-up to the story of Noah and the flood?
Therapeutic theology II: The Revenge
Friday, March 22, 2013
Simple secular case against abortion
In a recent article by Jonah Goldberg, I read how one can't lump all the social issues together. Some people are pro-choice, yet pro-same-sex marriage and some are pro-life and against same-sex marriage, etc. He then went on to write about how he has become more pro-life and why.
Excerpt:
As for abortion, my migration has less to do with religious arguments and more to do with my growing distrust of the government. Who is and who isn't a human being with unalienable rights is just about the biggest question there is. And just because the answer is usually obvious -- that guy, not that fly -- only makes it more important.
The government has an obligation to protect the life and liberty of the subset of human beings we call "Americans." If you commit a crime that obligation changes, of course, since the government also has an obligation to protect the rest of us from those who would do us harm.
Well, I consider a fetus a human being. It has done no harm, nor has
it committed a crime punishable by death. More important, I don't like
it when governments start getting clever about who counts as full human
beings and who doesn't (See: Slavery, U.S., or Holocaust, Nazi).
This is a simple case against abortion, but just because it's simple doesn't mean it's not effective or that it doesn't cause one to think about abortion harder. Usually secular cases against abortion deal a lot with scientific studies, arguments and philosophy. Not this one. Although, after thinking about it some more this simple argument does assume from the beginning that the fetus is a human being. If that is proven then the rest follows.
My case is simple too I think and favors Goldberg's.
If the fetus is a human being then the fetus has natural rights of life, liberty, and property that are to be respected by fellow human beings due to natural law. If the fetus is an American then those rights are protected by the government. Abortion violates the natural right of life of the human being who is in the womb of his mother. Therefore, abortion is wrong according to natural law and illegal according to civic law.
The question: is the fetus a human being?
Recommended reading
Is the unborn less than human?
A secular case against legalized abortion
10 arguments in favor of pro-choice policy
Excerpt:
As for abortion, my migration has less to do with religious arguments and more to do with my growing distrust of the government. Who is and who isn't a human being with unalienable rights is just about the biggest question there is. And just because the answer is usually obvious -- that guy, not that fly -- only makes it more important.
The government has an obligation to protect the life and liberty of the subset of human beings we call "Americans." If you commit a crime that obligation changes, of course, since the government also has an obligation to protect the rest of us from those who would do us harm.
This is a simple case against abortion, but just because it's simple doesn't mean it's not effective or that it doesn't cause one to think about abortion harder. Usually secular cases against abortion deal a lot with scientific studies, arguments and philosophy. Not this one. Although, after thinking about it some more this simple argument does assume from the beginning that the fetus is a human being. If that is proven then the rest follows.
My case is simple too I think and favors Goldberg's.
If the fetus is a human being then the fetus has natural rights of life, liberty, and property that are to be respected by fellow human beings due to natural law. If the fetus is an American then those rights are protected by the government. Abortion violates the natural right of life of the human being who is in the womb of his mother. Therefore, abortion is wrong according to natural law and illegal according to civic law.
The question: is the fetus a human being?
Recommended reading
Is the unborn less than human?
A secular case against legalized abortion
10 arguments in favor of pro-choice policy
Sunday, November 4, 2012
The True Cost of Abortion
DISCLAIMER: The following viewpoints are not
those of the blogger, but a friend of his. If this point of view upsets you,
you may vent, but don’t yell at the person who posted them. Start a discussion,
express and opinion, but don’t yell at the person who didn’t write it, that is
just senseless… These writings are the intellectual property of me, the Author,
with permission granted to the blogger who is positing them. They may not be
reposted or used in any form without express written consent by either myself
or the blogger of Reformed Seth.
The True Cost, and Sin, of Abortion:
As I sit here writing this article, I am
drawn to how to present this in a manner that isn’t preaching, but showing
fact, not about abortion being murder, or any of the Republican or Democrat
talking points, but as to the real cost of abortion that has, and is, crippling
this country.
Most will take this to be of a faith based
nature, and as far as that goes, abortions are between those who have them,
those who perform them, and God. I do not judge either way, but let’s look at
what abortions have cost our country.
FDR had a great experiment with our country,
and part of that was Social Security[1],
a great ponzi scheme if you think about it. Each generation would pay for the
generation before it. Sounds good, because abortion was not in the mainstream,
and wasn’t something that good old ‘Progressive’ President worried about. We
had a robust country, and with the growth potential, we could do anything,
achieve greatness.
Then we run into Roe vs Wade, the 1973
Supreme Court decision that gave women the right to ‘control their reproductive
systems’ and get abortions when they wanted. Abortion on demand if you will
accept the use of that term will always be a bad form of birth control.
So we now see that abortion has had dramatic
financial effects on the United States. With all the ‘baby boomers’ set to
retire, those who should have been paying into the system to keep it afloat, no
longer exist. So, exactly how many abortions have been committed, legally,
since Roe v Wade was passed? I have seen estimates ranging from 39 million to
54 million[2]
which breaks out to 1,350,000 a year or 3699 a day. (Almost 1,600,000 dollars a
day) THERE is one of the main reasons that abortion providers fight so hard to
keep them legal. Planned Parenthood may be screaming that they aren’t making
money providing the services for low wage income females who can’t afford the
services, thus they get federal money. There is money in genocide, and it seems
to pay well.[3](And
contrary to the hype from the liberal left, Planned Parenthood DOES NOT do
mammograms, they are not licensed to do so.)
Now let’s look at the societal effect of
abortion, and to me, this is where it really hurts us a country. I used the
term Genocide, and let me back that up. [Martin Luther King, Jr.] once said, “The Negro cannot win as long as he
is willing to sacrifice the lives of his children for comfort and safety.” How
can the “Dream” survive if we murder the children? Every aborted baby is like a
slave in the womb of his or her mother. The mother decides his or her fate. [4]
Even though we see where abortion rates have dropped for White and Black, markedly so, ‘Others’ as the next graph shows have dropped, but they were nowhere close to where Whites and Blacks were.[5]
So, some will say that all we have lost are
some gangbangers, prostitutes, drug abusers, sellers, and the ‘dregs’ of
society, but we have lost a human toll. Think about how many people who would
have made a change in this country, undoubtedly abortion has cost us a couple
of Presidents, members of Congress, Judges, Police Officers, Military
Personnel, Firefighters, civil servants of all branches of local, state and
federal government. We have also lost scientist, teachers, those who could
really make a difference in our world. Some woman who decided that a child
would screw up her life and had an abortion, she may have killed a child who
would have found a way to make fuel out of algae or salt water. We may have
lost an engineer who could have discovered ways to build bridges with a slower
rate of decay, thus not needing to replace our infrastructure as fast as it
should be done and maybe stronger for less.
Let’s talk for a second about the mental toll
on women who have had the procedure for rape, or incest. This is a travesty of
justice that also needs to be addressed. Yes, people are guaranteed the right
to face their accusers in court, but why do we victimize those who are attacked
whether by date rape, or molestation, or just a crime of opportunity? The
damage done to their psychology is almost beyond repair, and then they face the
trauma of going after the person who perpetrated this crime, as if they asked
for it! Unless they are into S&M, or along that ilk, I doubt if it was asked
for, yet these women who are brave enough to stand for their rights get
shunned, and I cannot imagine the horror that runs through their minds for the
rest of their lives. We need to change our laws to go after those who commit
rape or incest, and bring it upon them, not their victims, as a very close
friend of mine had been molested from 6 months to 12, when she found out it was
wrong. All her father got was a warning to stay away from children, but no jail
time. If congress can pass a flawed Lilly Ledbetter law, for a woman who sued a
company that fired her for cause – 28 years AFTER she was fired, why congress
can’t take care of this horror of our society is beyond me.
So, unlike a number of my Republican brethren
and Christians on the right, I do feel that abortions are something that we
need to stay out of. Yes, it seems we are waging a war on the productive rights
of Sandra Fluke, who can afford her own birth control, and the press blew up
something that didn’t exist to make a mockery out of health care. Should we
fight for the rights of the unborn? Yes, but we need to do so offering condoms,
counseling, care, friendship; not scorn or judgment. Only by changing the
hearts and minds of those who see abortion as the only answer can we change our
country, and put it back on a track of greatness, or, if you will, exceptionalism. We deserve it; we owe it to those who came before us, and those
who will come after us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)